In today’s digital age, information technology (IT) products are ubiquitous in our daily lives. However, individuals with disabilities still encounter challenges in utilizing these technologies. To ensure equitable access to IT products for people with disabilities, various laws, guidelines, and standards have been implemented. Notably, Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act, the 21st-Century Communications and Video Accessibility Act (CVAA), the European Accessibility Act (EAA), and the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) significantly influence the accessibility landscape of IT products. This article delves into an analysis of the primary accessibility provisions and guidelines from a user experience (UX) perspective and examines the IT device difficulties addressed by these regulations.
Introduction
The widespread use of IT products in today’s society underscores the importance of digital literacy. However, disparities in digital literacy contribute to the digital divide, particularly affecting individuals with disabilities. Accessibility, defined as enabling the use of products or systems by people with disabilities, is crucial in bridging this divide and ensuring inclusivity.
Various accessibility acts, guidelines, and standards have been established globally to address these challenges. In the United States, legislations such as the Americans with Disabilities Act and Section 508 mandate accessibility in federal agencies’ IT products. Similarly, the CVAA focuses on ensuring accessibility in modern communication technologies. In Europe, the EAA aims to harmonize accessibility standards across member states. Additionally, the WCAG provides comprehensive guidelines for web accessibility.
Accessibility Acts and Guidelines
Accessibility provisions and guidelines play a pivotal role in shaping the accessibility landscape for IT products. Section 508 mandates accessibility in federal IT procurements, ensuring equitable access for individuals with disabilities. The CVAA addresses accessibility in communication and video programming, while the EAA aims to standardize accessibility requirements across Europe. The WCAG provides detailed guidelines for web accessibility, covering a wide range of disabilities.
Analyzing Accessibility from a UX Perspective
Understanding accessibility from a UX perspective involves analyzing the comprehensive difficulties faced by users when interacting with IT devices. The concept of IT Interaction Disability (ITID) encompasses difficulties in interaction, considering sensory, cognitive, emotional, and action-related challenges. By mapping accessibility provisions and guidelines to the ITID framework, we can identify the specific difficulties addressed by these regulations.
Classification of ITID and Task-Interface-Context Framework
The ITID framework categorizes difficulties based on sensory, cognitive, emotional, and action-related challenges encountered during IT device interaction. The Task-Interface-Context (TIC) framework further delineates these difficulties based on specific tasks, user interface elements, and contextual factors. Analyzing ITIDs from this perspective provides insights into the accessibility provisions’ efficacy in addressing users’ needs.
Results and Discussion
The analysis revealed that sensory-related difficulties constitute a significant portion of ITIDs addressed by accessibility provisions. However, cognitive and emotional challenges are relatively underrepresented in current regulations. Moreover, software-related accessibility issues, particularly those concerning visual information, are predominant, highlighting the need for comprehensive guidelines for web accessibility. Contextual factors, while essential, are currently not adequately addressed in existing provisions.
Conclusion
In conclusion, this study underscores the importance of analyzing accessibility acts and guidelines from a UX perspective to ensure comprehensive coverage of users’ needs. While current regulations address many accessibility challenges, there is room for improvement, particularly in addressing cognitive, emotional, and contextual factors. By continuously refining accessibility provisions based on user experience insights, we can create more inclusive IT environments for individuals with disabilities.
Reference
Jones, M., DeRuyter, F., & Morris, J. (2020). The digital health revolution and people with disabilities: perspective from the United States. International journal of environmental research and public health, 17(2), 381.
Kim, H. K., & Park, J. (2020). Examination of the protection offered by current accessibility acts and guidelines to people with disabilities in using information technology devices. Electronics, 9(5), 742.
Mason, A. M., Compton, J., & Bhati, S. (2021). Disabilities and the digital divide: assessing web accessibility, readability, and mobility of popular health websites. Journal of health communication, 26(10), 667-674.